Phelps, Louise & John M. Ackerman (2010). Making the Case for Disciplinarity in Rhetoric, Composition, and Writing Studies: The Visibility Project. College Composition and Communication, 62.1 (180-215).
Ackerman, J. and Coogan, J. (Eds.). (2010). The Public Work of Rhetoric: Citizen-Scholars and Civic Engagement. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Banning, Marlia Elisabeth, “When Poststructural Theory and Contemporary Politics Collide—The Vexed Case of Global Warming” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies. Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 285–304.
Boromisza-Habashi, D. (2010). How are political concepts ‘essentially’ contested? Language & Communication, 30, 276-284.
Boromisza-Habashi, D. (2010). From freedom of speech to free speech: Response to John Durham Peters’ Courting the Abyss. In J. Dee (Ed.), Free Speech Yearbook, Vol. 44. (pp. 173-175). Washington, D.C.: National Communication Association.
Boromisza-Habashi, D. (2011). Dismantling the antiracist “hate speech” agenda in Hungary: An ethno-rhetorical analysis. Text & Talk, 31, 1-19.
Guy and Heidi Burgess:
Burgess, H. & G. Burgess, Conducting Track II Peacemaking, Washington, D. C.: US Institute of Peace, 2010 (in “Peacemaker’s Toolkit” Series).
Deetz, S. (2009). Politically attentive relational constructionism (PARC) and making a difference in a pluralistic, interdependent world. In D. Carbaugh and P. Buzzanell (eds.) Reflections on the distinctive qualities of communication research in the social sciences (pp. 32-52). New York: Taylor Francis.
Wieland, S. & Bauer, J. & Deetz, S. (2009). Excessive careerism and destructive life stresses: The role of entrepreneurialism in colonizing identities. In B. Sypher and P. Lutgen-Sandvik (eds.) The destructive side of organizational communication (pp. 99-120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Deetz, S. (2009). Organizational research as a multi-paradigmatic domain. In A. Bryman and D. Buchanan (eds.), Handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 19-38). London: Sage Publications.
Deetz, S. & McClellan, J. (2009). Critical studies. In F. Bargiela (ed.), Handbook of business discourse (pp. 119-131). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.
McClellan, J & Deetz, S. (2009). Communication and critical management Studies. In H. Willmott, T. Bridgman and M. Alvesson (eds.), Handbook of critical management studies (pp. 433-453). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stan Deetz, “A ascensao dos modelos de governanca de stakeholders e o consequente redesenho da comunicacao,” in Margardia M. Krohling Kunsch (Ed.), A communicacao na gestao da sustentabilidade das organizacoes (85 – ).
Tim Newton, Stan Deetz, and Mike Reed, “Responses to Social Constructionism and Critical Realism in Organization Studies,” Organization Studies, 32 (1), 2011, pp. 1-24.
Frey, L. R. (2009). Social justice. In S. W. Littlejohn & K. A. Foss (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communication theory (Vol. 2, pp. 908–911). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Frey, L. R. (2009). Symbolic–interpretive perspective on groups. In S. W. Littlejohn & K. A. Foss (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communication theory (Vol. 2, pp. 948–950). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Frey, L. R. (2010). Sharing sexual fantasies. In C. Noland, J. Manning, & J. MacLennan (Eds.), Case studies in communication about sex (pp. 31–37). Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom: Cambridge Scholars.
John P. Jackson:
John P. Jackson, Jr. and Andrew Winston, “The Last Repatriationist: The Career of Ernest Sevier Cox” in Race and Science: Scientific Challenges to Racism in Modern America, edited by Paul Farber and Hamilton Cravens, (Eugene: Oregon State University Press, 2009).
John P. Jackson, “Definitional Argument in Evolutionary Psychology and Cultural Anthropology,” Science in Context, Volume 23, Issue 01, March 2010, pp 121 – 150.
Jackson Jr., John P.(2010) ‘Whatever Happened to the Cephalic Index? The Reality of Race and the Burden of Proof’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 40: 5, 438 — 458
Leonardi, Paul M., Treem, Jeffrey W. and Jackson, Michele H.(2010) ‘The Connectivity Paradox: Using Technology to Both Decrease and Increase Perceptions of Distance in Distributed Work Arrangements’, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38: 1, 85 – 105
Lewis, C., Jackson, M.H., & Waite, W.W. (2010). Attitudes and beliefs about computer science among students and faculty. Communications of the ACM, 53(5), 78-85.
Koschmann, M., Isbell, M. G. (2009). Towards a communicative model of interorganizational collaboration: The case of the Community Action Network. Case Research Journal, 29(1 & 2), pp. 1-28.
Koschmann, M. (2010). Communication as a distinct mode of explanation makes a difference. Communication Monographs, 77(4), 432-434.
Lewis, L. K., Isbell, M. G., & Koschmann, M. (2010). Collaborative tensions: Practitioners experiences of interorganizational collaboration. Communication Monographs, 77(4), 460-479.
Koschmann, M. & Laster, N. (2011). “Communicative tensions of community organizing: The case of a local neighborhood association.” Western Journal of Communication, 75(1), 28-51.
Koschmann, M., Lewis, L.K., & Isbell, M.G. (2011). “Effective collaboration in a complex and interdependent society.” White paper published for the Directorate for the Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences of the National Science Foundation: Framing Innovative Research for 2020 and Beyond.
Timothy Kuhn, Positioning Lawyers: Discursive Resources, Professional Ethics and Identification, Organization (September 2009)
Patricia Malesh and Sharon Stevens (eds). Active Voices: Composing a Rhetoric of Social Movements (New York: SUNY Press), 2009.
P. Malesh, “The Battle Within: Understanding the Persuasive Affect of Internal Rhetorics in the Ethical Vegetarian/Vegan Movement.” In Arguments about Animal Ethics, eds. Jason Black and Gregory Goodale (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2010).
Peter Simonson [Documentary Film] Out of the Question: Women, Media, and the Art of Inquiry. This documentary follows the lives of five American women active in the fields of sociology, media, and communication research in the 1940s and after
“The Streets of Laredo: Mercurian Rhetoric and the Obama Campaign,” Western Journal of Communication (2010, Vol. 74, Issue 1, pp. 94-126).
“Hugh Duncan’s Forgotten Corpus,” in Mark Porrovecchio, ed., Reengaging the Prospects of Rhetoric: Current Conversations and Contemporary Challenges (Routledge, 2010).
Peter Simonson, Refiguring Mass Communication: A History (Urbana-Champaign; University of Illinois Press, 2010).
Peter Simonson, “Merton’s Sociology of Rhetoric,” in Craig Calhoun, ed., Robert K. Merton: The Sociology of Science and Sociology as Science (Columbia University Press).
Bryan C. Taylor
Bryan C. Taylor, “A Hedge against the Future: The Post-Cold War Rhetoric of Nuclear Weapons Modernization.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, 96: 1 (2010), 1-24.
“Radioactive History: Rhetoric, Memory, and Place in the Post-Cold War Nuclear Museum.” In Places of Public Memory: The Rhetoric of Museums and Memorials, ed. G. Dickinson, B. L. Ott, and C. Blair (pp. 57-86). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2010.
Thomas R. Lindlof and Bryan C. Taylor, Qualitative Communication Research Methods, 3rd ed. (Los Angeles: Sage, 2011).
Bryan C. Taylor and Leonard C. Hawes, “’What are We, Then?’: Postmodernism , Globalization, and the Meta-Ethics of Contemporary Communication.” In The Handbook of Communication Ethics, ed. G. Cheney, S. May, & D. Munshi (pp. 99-118). New York: Routledge, 2011.
Karen Tracy, Challenges of Ordinary Democracy: A Case Study in Deliberation and Dissent. (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2011).
Tracy, K., & Robles, J. S. (2010). Challenges of interviewers’ institutional positionings: Taking
account of interview content and the interaction. Communication Methods and Measures, 4(3), 266-289.